Author: Stefano Gemma
Date: 14:43:35 08/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2005 at 21:12:13, Pedro Gomes wrote:
...
>I think 0.14 is not stronger than 0.11.
>The only advantage is more natural time menagement.
...
Maybe this should make a little stronger, in tournements. But the time handling
has ever been problematic, in Raffaela. If i have some time, i'll correct. I've
even tryed something in check test, that seems to give about 20% more
moves/second... but no more nodes/second. Maybe i take away this optimization,
because it could be the reason of this bug: Raffaela do check by moving a pawn
by 2 and claim for mate... but the mate is some move after, because of the
en-passant!
Thank to Ciro, for this test game:
[Event "Computer chess game"]
[Site "CIRO-OLD"]
[Date "2005.08.08"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Raffaela_0140"]
[Black "ECE_01"]
[Result "1-0"]
[TimeControl "300"]
1. d4 d5 2. Qd3 e5 3. dxe5 Nc6 4. e6 Bxe6 5. Qb5 Nf6 6. Qxb7 Bd6 7. Qxc6+
Ke7 8. Bg5 Bxh2 9. Rxh2 d4 10. Qb7 Kd6 11. Bf4+ Kc5 12. Bxc7 Qxc7 13. Qxc7+
Kd5 14. e4+ Nxe4 15. c4+
{White mates} 1-0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.