Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 15:38:42 08/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2005 at 17:31:48, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >Do you plan to do some test games with 8 CPU on ICC ? >If yes, I'll take a look ... > I may try tonight, say after 8pm-9pm. If I do, I'll say something in channel 64 for a "heads-up" and may be looking for volunteers to play some unrated games to make sure everything is working... I doubt I'll play any rated games since it would be unfair to use that kind of hardware with a dual pentium 2.8 hardware ICC "rating"... > >On August 08, 2005 at 16:40:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>... >> >> time=3:20 mat=-3 n=371229148 fh=93% nps=1.86M >> time=3:20 mat=-3 n=387456032 fh=94% nps=1.94M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=393026421 fh=94% nps=1.97M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=438914927 fh=96% nps=2.19M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=446588116 fh=95% nps=2.23M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=431924227 fh=93% nps=2.16M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=438675907 fh=94% nps=2.19M >> time=3:20 mat=1 n=418326816 fh=92% nps=2.09M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=423806907 fh=92% nps=2.12M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=412172447 fh=91% nps=2.06M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=452391068 fh=93% nps=2.26M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=452926645 fh=93% nps=2.26M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=452392284 fh=93% nps=2.26M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=463384147 fh=92% nps=2.32M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=458280168 fh=92% nps=2.29M >> time=3:20 mat=5 n=450563188 fh=93% nps=2.25M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=448600113 fh=92% nps=2.24M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=430064921 fh=92% nps=2.15M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=389967561 fh=91% nps=1.95M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=404756618 fh=90% nps=2.02M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=393679306 fh=90% nps=1.97M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=391818850 fh=90% nps=1.96M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=397601175 fh=90% nps=1.99M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=400104638 fh=90% nps=2.00M >>opteron% grep nps cbrun.log.mt=8b.200 >> time=3:20 mat=-3 n=2806042190 fh=93% nps=14.03M >> time=3:20 mat=-3 n=2916788431 fh=93% nps=14.58M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=2873784299 fh=93% nps=14.37M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=3103862678 fh=95% nps=15.52M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=3337271703 fh=94% nps=16.69M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=3260770604 fh=93% nps=16.30M >> time=3:20 mat=-2 n=3354633576 fh=93% nps=16.77M >> time=3:20 mat=1 n=3226460542 fh=92% nps=16.13M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=3139153516 fh=92% nps=15.70M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=3244312269 fh=92% nps=16.22M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3297166602 fh=92% nps=16.49M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3413063738 fh=92% nps=17.07M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3376699324 fh=92% nps=16.88M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3311204158 fh=91% nps=16.56M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3374495270 fh=92% nps=16.87M >> time=3:20 mat=5 n=3298033933 fh=92% nps=16.49M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3224183497 fh=91% nps=16.12M >> time=3:20 mat=0 n=3056891697 fh=91% nps=15.28M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=2870594426 fh=91% nps=14.35M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=3023374513 fh=90% nps=15.12M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=2977525743 fh=90% nps=14.89M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=2993177265 fh=89% nps=14.97M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=3003140555 fh=89% nps=15.02M >> time=3:20 mat=-1 n=2996154121 fh=89% nps=14.98M >>opteron% >> >> >>The first set of numbers if from a single-cpu run on the quad 875, over the old >>Cray Blitz test positions we were using in last years argument. The second set >>of numbers is with 8 cpus. Time limit for both runs was 200 seconds per >>position. Numbers are not "pefect" yet, but for the first position, the scaling >>is 7.54X (NPS scaling). Which is almost 8.0. >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.