Author: Daniel Mehrmannn
Date: 04:22:07 08/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2005 at 06:31:46, Günther Simon wrote: >On August 09, 2005 at 06:23:46, Karl-Heinz Söntges wrote: > >>COPY >> >>email Gaksch ./. Letouzey and Söntges >> >>Hi Fabien, >> >>i sent mr. söntges a prerelease version for a last test. at the moment i test >>only the value of two parameters and will distribute the version on saturday. (I >>hope alex ist not on holidays). then i also add some comments to the readme >>file. >> >>please do not attack mr. söntges in the ccc forum. >> >>you know that mailing an open source program like i did is GPL conform. there is >>no must to distribute beta versions. i have done this because i didn?t want to >>quarrel. >> >>regards >>Thomas >> > >You still seem not to understand? Just keep the results for the 'beta', >instead of posting them around! YOUR posting of results of such a 'beta' >starts the conflict with GPL. > >Guenther Well, i try now to make it clear and ends up this nerves topic: 1. Thomas must even publish the source if he published a new version. 2. Thomas must give his source too if he send new alpha/beta versions to test people 3. The tester can published results of this versions and they don't need to published the source expect they offers a binary for download. All others are easy wrong and won't follow the GPL. Best, Daniel Member of the Free Software Foundation and license observer for the FSF.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.