Author: Daniel Mehrmannn
Date: 09:39:09 08/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2005 at 08:34:38, Volker Annuss wrote: >On August 09, 2005 at 07:22:07, Daniel Mehrmannn wrote: > >>Well, i try now to make it clear and ends up this nerves topic: >> >>1. Thomas must even publish the source if he published a new version. >> >>2. Thomas must give his source too if he send new alpha/beta versions to test >>people >> >>3. The tester can published results of this versions and they don't need to >>published the source expect they offers a binary for download. >> >>All others are easy wrong and won't follow the GPL. > >Something might not be clear. I think if your points are OK ... > >- it is legal for the tester to keep the test version private. > >- neither Fabien nor Thomas have control over what the tester does with the >program. > >- The tester is allowed to give copies to anyone he wants (but always including >source code if he does so). There is no need for him to make it available to the >whole world. > >Am I right? Yes, that's all right. Remember that we're only talking about the GPL. If it's good or not isn't crucial. Fabien wants some "extensions" in this handling and i would say that all guys should follow this line, because it prevents some special problems in our community. But again, this "extensions" are no components of the GPL. Best, Daniel
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.