Author: Pedro Gomes
Date: 13:03:25 08/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2005 at 10:45:52, Joachim Rang wrote: >On August 09, 2005 at 10:34:20, Stan Arts wrote: > >>On August 09, 2005 at 10:05:54, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>He added some insignificant lines which lead to a strength increase of about 50 >>>Elopoints. Fabien decided to adopt (some) of his ideas. Yeah what did he do >>>anyway? >>> >>>regards Joachim >> >> >> >>Well, that's great, but his code without Fruit would mean he would go from 0 to >>0 Elo, wouldn't it? >>Writing a program to play 2600 Elo takes ALL the work, then playing around with >>it's existing components isn't so difficult is it? Who wouldn't be able to do >>that? And if you play around long enough sure enough maybe you'll get lucky and >>find something that works. Especially since you can just undo crap ideas. It's >>called "tuning". Not exactly a reason to give a program a new name. >> >>>Fabien decided to adopt (some) of his ideas. >> >>:) >> >>Regards, >>Stan > > >as I already wrote tha name is "Toga based on Fruit" I think this describes the >situation pretty accurate and of course Fabien's contribution is much greater >than that of Thomas, but who doubted this in the first time? > >regards Joachim In this case: Why the author don´t abrevate it in "Toga-Fruit" ? Athough I think that the truth is "Fruit-Töga", because Fruit is 90 % of the code. Regards HF Pedro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.