Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:24:17 08/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2005 at 17:51:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On August 10, 2005 at 14:41:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>Congratulations for this brilliant game. >> >>It´s funny to see how long it take for current programs to find 24. Rde1 ! >> >>But the game is much deeper, soo the moves before are far behind the quest. >> >>I hope we will see this program in the future running in a uci-gui. >> >>Thx for this fantastic game. >> >>TL > >Your subject line is Nonsense. >Whatever played with white pieces is just an insane attacker. >Otherwise it wouldn´t evaluate 11.g4? as slightly better for white. >This move is totally unsound. > >Michael The move is totally sound against chess tiger15 as the game proved. Lasker already said that you should not play the best move but the move that is more unconvenient to your opponent. Even if g4 is objectively bad(I did not analyze it to have an opinion) then it was still a good idea to play it against tiger15 and maybe the program that played with white used special anti-tiger setting(I do not know which program played against tiger15). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.