Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 06:23:12 02/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 1999 at 01:39:31, Mark Young wrote: <SNIP> > >: Djordje's withdrawal should not be used for anti-moderator rhetoric? > >Yes it should, because it go's right to the point of why there should be open >discussion of moderation. As it was in the past, and how it should be now. > In your opinion !! not in mine. Without the facts, judging Will for an Email that he sent without reading it is wrong. > > Correct, but whos fault is that, It was the moderators who commanded that such complaints and e-mails are now off topic and Banned. It did not use to be that way. And is my only problem with the moderators. I think that they should act as they see fit, but the moderators also should allow the members to post e-mail or other abuses if they feel it necessary for the members to judge. The members should have a right to know if the moderators are being abuses. Now we have two examples of this, and two members are now gone because they have no recourse to the moderators abuses. I assume you are counting yourself as one of those two, remember we the members of CCC wanted strong moderation, even this post I am making is in itself off-topic. So I will add, I think CM6K will be 5th on the next SSDF :))) No one is perfect, and the moderators should allow members to discuss moderation and show why they think they were abused. Right now all the member can do is take the abuse or leave. Which you already did I think choose to do? so why the post?. > > >Mark Young > <SNIP>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.