Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:52:27 08/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2005 at 04:05:19, Günther Simon wrote: >On August 11, 2005 at 03:59:42, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 11, 2005 at 03:19:55, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On August 11, 2005 at 02:45:07, Madhavan wrote: >>> >>>>On August 11, 2005 at 01:07:58, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>... due to its very bad opening play. Such >>>>>silly things can/should never happen in >>>>>classical chess. It's just ridiculous. >>>>>Kurt >>>> >>>>How come Shredder won several tournament titles? >>>>How do you know Almasi plays decent chess openeings? >>> >>> In a German forum it was reported that >>> "Shredder had after 3 moves a much better >>> and after 10 moves a won position". This >>> means for me that FRC (Chess960) even on >>> such a top level is somewhat ridiculous. >>> Kurt >> >>Or maybe it means that slower time control than classical chess should be used >>in FRC to prevent this type of errors(at least in the high level). >> >>Uri > >I thought the games were just rapid chess anyway? > >Guenther I also think that they were rapid chess and I see no reason to generate events that almost nobody is interested in them. At least the match of the baron was 25+10 time control based on reading the following post when 25+10 is mentioned in the pgn http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?441035
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.