Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 05:49:16 08/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2005 at 18:24:17, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 10, 2005 at 17:51:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On August 10, 2005 at 14:41:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>Congratulations for this brilliant game. >>> >>>It´s funny to see how long it take for current programs to find 24. Rde1 ! >>> >>>But the game is much deeper, soo the moves before are far behind the quest. >>> >>>I hope we will see this program in the future running in a uci-gui. >>> >>>Thx for this fantastic game. >>> >>>TL >> >>Your subject line is Nonsense. Yep, i don't agree too that XXX-9 is 300 ELO stronger or even stronger than current top programs.......Although nonsense is not so polite word......:-) >>Whatever played with white pieces is just an insane attacker. >>Otherwise it wouldn´t evaluate 11.g4? as slightly better for white. >>This move is totally unsound. >> >>Michael > >The move is totally sound against chess tiger15 as the game proved. > >Lasker already said that you should not play the best move but the move that is >more unconvenient to your opponent. > >Even if g4 is objectively bad(I did not analyze it to have an opinion) then it >was still a good idea to play it against tiger15 and maybe the program that >played with white used special anti-tiger setting(I do not know which program >played against tiger15). > Certainly XXX-9 doesn't have an Anti-ChessTiger setting....:-) It would play it against all other programs with the same time control. XXX-9 is a beta version of a new Chess engine......
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.