Author: Dan Kiski
Date: 06:51:39 02/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 1999 at 01:39:31, Mark Young wrote: Corrected version. >: Djordje's withdrawal should not be used for anti-moderator rhetoric? > >Yes it should, because it go's right to the point of why there should be open >discussion of moderation. As it was in the past, and how it should be now. > In your opinion !! not in mine. >>>Without the facts, judging Will for an Email that he sent without reading it is >>>wrong. > > >Correct, but whos fault is that, It was the moderators who commanded that such >complaints and e-mails are now off topic and Banned. It did not use to be that >way. And is my only problem with the moderators. I think that they should act as >they see fit, but the moderators also should allow the members to post e-mail or >other abuses if they feel it necessary for the members to judge. The members >should have a right to know if the moderators are being abuses. Now we have two >examples of this, and two members are now gone because they have no recourse to >the moderators abuses. I assume you are counting yourself as one of those two, remember we the members of CCC wanted strong moderation, even this post I am making is in itself off-topic. So I will add, I think CM6K will be 5th on the next SSDF :))) > >No one is perfect, and the moderators should allow members to discuss moderation >and show why they think they were abused. Right now all the member can do is >take the abuse or leave. > Which you already did I think choose to do? so why the post?. > >Mark Young >
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.