Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 10:22:29 08/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2005 at 17:51:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On August 10, 2005 at 14:41:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>Congratulations for this brilliant game. >> >>It´s funny to see how long it take for current programs to find 24. Rde1 ! >> >>But the game is much deeper, soo the moves before are far behind the quest. >> >>I hope we will see this program in the future running in a uci-gui. >> >>Thx for this fantastic game. >> >>TL > >Your subject line is Nonsense. >Whatever played with white pieces is just an insane attacker. >Otherwise it wouldn´t evaluate 11.g4? as slightly better for white. >This move is totally unsound. > >Michael My subject line is not(!) nonsense. I didn´t have said that XXX9 is 300 elopoints stronger as other programs. I have said that the performance of this single game is 300 elopoints stronger as current programs can play. This is not the same. Some notes to the game: You are right 11.g4?! is not the best move, but that´s all. But the rest of the game is really unbelievable and this is not less. I will be a lucky guy when this program will see the light of the world in a uci-gui. TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.