Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:15:34 08/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2005 at 13:22:29, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >On August 10, 2005 at 17:51:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On August 10, 2005 at 14:41:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>Congratulations for this brilliant game. >>> >>>It´s funny to see how long it take for current programs to find 24. Rde1 ! >>> >>>But the game is much deeper, soo the moves before are far behind the quest. >>> >>>I hope we will see this program in the future running in a uci-gui. >>> >>>Thx for this fantastic game. >>> >>>TL >> >>Your subject line is Nonsense. >>Whatever played with white pieces is just an insane attacker. >>Otherwise it wouldn´t evaluate 11.g4? as slightly better for white. >>This move is totally unsound. >> >>Michael > >My subject line is not(!) nonsense. I didn´t have said that XXX9 is 300 >elopoints stronger as other programs. I have said that the performance of this >single game is 300 elopoints stronger as current programs can play. This is not >the same. Doesn´t make sense. >Some notes to the game: > >You are right 11.g4?! is not the best move, but that´s all. Not at all, 11.g4? is a loosing move. After the obvious 11...b4 black has full control over the center. Michael >But the rest of the game is really unbelievable and this is not less. > >I will be a lucky guy when this program will see the light of the world in a >uci-gui. > >TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.