Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What Happened to Chess? FRC is not Chess!

Author: Roger Brown

Date: 20:33:25 08/11/05

Go up one level in this thread



>Capablanca, remember him? He too didn't put much time on the openings, instead
>he went on principles, which he had a deep understanding. Instead he put his
>time to endgame study, as that is the most subtle and complex part of chess.
>
>Would he do it differently today? Maybe, but I bet he wouldn't waste nearly as
>much time on long opening lines, just what he needed and back to the endgame.
>
>Capablanca was probably the greatest natural chess genius the world has ever
>known. The Einstein of Chess! Don't believe me? Ask Fischer!;-)
>
>Terry



Hello Terry,

Isn't the citing of an exception such as Capablanca the proof of the general
rule that the modern chess player pays a lot of attention to the latest opening
theory?  Often studying pet lines into moves 15 and beyond?

Kasparov
Karpov
Alekhine (my personal favourite)
Anand

Later.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.