Author: Thomas Lagershausen
Date: 03:24:56 08/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2005 at 17:15:34, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On August 11, 2005 at 13:22:29, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: > >>On August 10, 2005 at 17:51:32, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On August 10, 2005 at 14:41:49, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>>Congratulations for this brilliant game. >>>> >>>>It´s funny to see how long it take for current programs to find 24. Rde1 ! >>>> >>>>But the game is much deeper, soo the moves before are far behind the quest. >>>> >>>>I hope we will see this program in the future running in a uci-gui. >>>> >>>>Thx for this fantastic game. >>>> >>>>TL >>> >>>Your subject line is Nonsense. >>>Whatever played with white pieces is just an insane attacker. >>>Otherwise it wouldn´t evaluate 11.g4? as slightly better for white. >>>This move is totally unsound. >>> >>>Michael >> >>My subject line is not(!) nonsense. I didn´t have said that XXX9 is 300 >>elopoints stronger as other programs. I have said that the performance of this >>single game is 300 elopoints stronger as current programs can play. This is not >>the same. > >Doesn´t make sense. So you have to learn a lot. Your horizon is too small for me. > > >>Some notes to the game: >> >>You are right 11.g4?! is not the best move, but that´s all. > >Not at all, 11.g4? is a loosing move. After the obvious 11...b4 black has full >control over the center. Right, but a long analyse of Shredder show me good counterplay for white to make things not easy for black. TL > >Michael > >>But the rest of the game is really unbelievable and this is not less. >> >>I will be a lucky guy when this program will see the light of the world in a >>uci-gui. >> >>TL
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.