Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT

Author: Joachim Rang

Date: 11:40:35 08/12/05

Go up one level in this thread

On August 12, 2005 at 14:20:11, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On August 12, 2005 at 13:48:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:33:13, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>.
>>
>>I do not understand your reason.
>>
>>Shredder's failure is not a reason not to recognize FRC as true chess.
>>Uri
>
>The game has 960 positions, and these postions break equalibrium, and _true_
>chess is balanced in the intial starting postion.
>

Examples? Data? Research?

I think you are plain wrong and ignorant.

regards Joachim

• Examples! Data! Research! No bigger white advantage than in normal chess Volker Annuss 12:22:56 08/14/05
• Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT Terry McCracken 16:24:15 08/12/05
  • Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT Joachim Rang 08:11:04 08/13/05
    • Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT Terry McCracken 12:20:08 08/13/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.