Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT

Author: Terry McCracken

Date: 16:24:15 08/12/05

Go up one level in this thread

On August 12, 2005 at 14:40:35, Joachim Rang wrote:

>On August 12, 2005 at 14:20:11, Terry McCracken wrote:
>
>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:48:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:33:13, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>
>>>>.
>>>
>>>I do not understand your reason.
>>>
>>>Shredder's failure is not a reason not to recognize FRC as true chess.
>>>Uri
>>
>>The game has 960 positions, and these postions break equalibrium, and _true_
>>chess is balanced in the intial starting postion.
>>
>
>Examples? Data? Research?
>
>I think you are plain wrong and ignorant.
>
>regards Joachim

You're cruising...personal insults are not a good idea. I think I know chess a
little better than you.

You don't have to agree with me, but being vulgar, scores no points.

• Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT Joachim Rang 08:11:04 08/13/05
  • Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT Terry McCracken 12:20:08 08/13/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.