Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 16:28:36 08/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 2005 at 14:04:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 12, 2005 at 13:52:34, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On August 12, 2005 at 11:34:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 12, 2005 at 11:31:26, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On August 12, 2005 at 05:46:42, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 07, 2005 at 00:12:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On August 06, 2005 at 21:27:32, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On August 06, 2005 at 20:15:07, gerold daniels wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Would it have much of an impact on the commercial Programs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Gerold. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I don´t think it will have a strong impact for the Comercial Programs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>However, your question is too too wide and any answer is a mere speculation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Ok, my answers (speculations) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>1) Fruit could become comercial. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>2) It would be a great surprise because it would be the first free chess program >>>>>>>with open source in winning a Title. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Oops. :) >>>>> >>>>>This Oops means you asphyxiated. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Cray Blitz won several, and it was always "open source" as well. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>The chess 4.x guys distributed their source thru the CDC user's group as well... >>>>> >>>>>Was Cray Blitz and Chess 4.X Amateur Engines? As far as I know, Chess 4.X was >>>>>the strongest engine in the 70s but was it considered an Ameteur? The same >>>>>question goes for Cray Blitz. >>>>> >>>>>For me, Fruit would be the first engine in reaching an Official WCCC Tournament. >>>>>Does it hurt your pride? >>>> >>>>Why do you think that fruit is going to win with all the hardware disadvantage >>>>that it has? >>>> >>>>Junior,Shredder,Zappa and maybe even Crafty or Diep(if the programmers improved >>>>their software significantly) are better candidates to win because of better >>>>hardware. >>>> >>>>I believe that the chances of fruit to get first place is only 1% >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I think that better english for the last sentence is: >>>"I estimate the probability of fruit to win wccc as 1%" >>> >> >>You have missed all the point and you are out of topic. You did not understand >>anything. So, close your mouth here. >> >>Better english is to understand what it is written. > >The discussion is about what if fruit wins the title. >If the assumption is that is is almost certain that fruit does not win then I do >not see the point of the discussion. > >If this is not the assumption then I think that lack of good hardware for fruit >is underestimated. > >Uri Blah Blah, stop the pre-WCCC nonsense.... find a real interesting activity to do. Yes, but I have not said that this is my favorite engine. More nonsense and absurdity. I thought that you already belonged to the real world and you had come back from Pluto. Well, I am wrong.....
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.