Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: This is One Reason I Don't Recognize FRC or 960 as *True* Chess NT

Author: Joachim Rang

Date: 08:11:04 08/13/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 12, 2005 at 19:24:15, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On August 12, 2005 at 14:40:35, Joachim Rang wrote:
>
>>On August 12, 2005 at 14:20:11, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>
>>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:48:21, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:33:13, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>.
>>>>
>>>>I do not understand your reason.
>>>>
>>>>Shredder's failure is not a reason not to recognize FRC as true chess.
>>>>Uri
>>>
>>>The game has 960 positions, and these postions break equalibrium, and _true_
>>>chess is balanced in the intial starting postion.
>>>
>>
>>Examples? Data? Research?
>>
>>I think you are plain wrong and ignorant.
>>
>>regards Joachim
>
>You're cruising...personal insults are not a good idea. I think I know chess a
>little better than you.
>
>You don't have to agree with me, but being vulgar, scores no points.

Okay sorry for that. I don't agree with you and I would be happy if you could
back up your harsh judgement about Chess960 with some arguments and examples.

regards Joachim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.