Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 12:20:08 08/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2005 at 11:11:04, Joachim Rang wrote: >On August 12, 2005 at 19:24:15, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On August 12, 2005 at 14:40:35, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On August 12, 2005 at 14:20:11, Terry McCracken wrote: >>> >>>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:48:21, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 12, 2005 at 13:33:13, Terry McCracken wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>. >>>>> >>>>>I do not understand your reason. >>>>> >>>>>Shredder's failure is not a reason not to recognize FRC as true chess. >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>The game has 960 positions, and these postions break equalibrium, and _true_ >>>>chess is balanced in the intial starting postion. >>>> >>> >>>Examples? Data? Research? >>> >>>I think you are plain wrong and ignorant. >>> >>>regards Joachim >> >>You're cruising...personal insults are not a good idea. I think I know chess a >>little better than you. >> >>You don't have to agree with me, but being vulgar, scores no points. > >Okay sorry for that. I don't agree with you and I would be happy if you could >back up your harsh judgement about Chess960 with some arguments and examples. > >regards Joachim It's fine we don't agree, and you have a valid point about providing some evidence, to back my claims. At this time I will admit I don't have hard evidence, just my intuition, which can't be taken as evidence. If I have time to investigate 960 further and find I'm wrong I'll retract, and if I find I'm right I'll demonstrate it. At least to a point....it might take a whole book!;-) Best, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.