Author: gerold daniels
Date: 15:20:30 08/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2005 at 11:15:16, Joachim Rang wrote: >Did you notice that the recent Chess960-CCC had a whopping drawing percentage of >only 11%? It was rapid chess this may partly explain this but nevertheless quite >a difference to classical tournaments. > >Paarungsliste der 1. Runde >Shredder (0) - Nexus (0) 1 - 0 >Glaurung (0) - List (0) 1 - 0 >Deep Sjeng(0) - Ant960 (0) ½ - ½ >Quark (0) - Pharaon (0) 0 - 1 >parSOS (0) - Patzer (0) 1 - 0 >XiniX (0) - Spike (0) 0 - 1 >Ikarus (0) - Hermann (0) 1 - 0 >Homer (0) - Jonny (0) 0 - 1 >TheBaron (0) - Ayito (0) 1 - 0 >AICE (0) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 2. Runde >Jonny (1) - Shredder (1) 0 - 1 >Pharaon (1) - Ikarus (1) 1 - 0 >AICE (1) - parSOS (1) 0 - 1 >Spike (1) - TheBaron (1) 1 - 0 >Ant960 (½) - Glaurung (1) ½ - ½ >List (0) - Deep Sjeng(½) 1 - 0 >Nexus (0) - XiniX (0) ½ - ½ >Hermann (0) - Quark (0) 0 - 1 >Patzer (0) - Homer (0) 1 - 0 >Ayito (0) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 3. Runde >Shredder (2) - Spike (2) 0 - 1 >parSOS (2) - Pharaon (2) 0 - 1 >Glaurung (1½) - Jonny (1) 0 - 1 >Quark (1) - List (1) 0 - 1 >Ikarus (1) - Patzer (1) 1 - 0 >TheBaron (1) - AICE (1) 1 - 0 >Ayito (1) - Ant960 (1) 0 - 1 >Deep Sjeng(½) - Nexus (½) 1 - 0 >XiniX (½) - Hermann (0) 0 - 1 >Homer (0) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 4. Runde >Pharaon (3) - Spike (3) 0 - 1 >Ant960 (2) - Shredder (2) 0 - 1 >List (2) - Ikarus (2) ½ - ½ >Jonny (2) - parSOS (2) 1 - 0 >Deep Sjeng(1½) - TheBaron (2) 1 - 0 >Patzer (1) - Glaurung (1½) 0 - 1 >Homer (1) - Quark (1) 0 - 1 >Hermann (1) - Ayito (1) 1 - 0 >AICE (1) - XiniX (½) 1 - 0 >Nexus (½) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 5. Runde >Spike (4) - Jonny (3) ½ - ½ >Shredder (3) - Pharaon (3) 1 - 0 >Glaurung (2½) - Deep Sjeng(2½) ½ - ½ >parSOS (2) - List (2½) 1 - 0 >Ikarus (2½) - Ant960 (2) 1 - 0 >TheBaron (2) - Hermann (2) 1 - 0 >Quark (2) - AICE (2) 1 - 0 >Nexus (1½) - Homer (1) 1 - 0 >Ayito (1) - Patzer (1) 0 - 1 >XiniX (½) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 6. Runde >Spike (4½) - Ikarus (3½) 1 - 0 >TheBaron (3) - Shredder (4) 1 - 0 >Jonny (3½) - Quark (3) 1 - 0 >Deep Sjeng(3) - parSOS (3) 1 - 0 >Pharaon (3) - Glaurung (3) 0 - 1 >List (2½) - Nexus (2½) 1 - 0 >Ant960 (2) - AICE (2) 0 - 1 >Patzer (2) - XiniX (1½) 0 - 1 >Homer (1) - Ayito (1) 1 - 0 >Hermann (2) - spielfrei (0) + - - > >Paarungsliste der 7. Runde >Glaurung (4) - Spike (5½) 1 - 0 >Jonny (4½) - TheBaron (4) 1 - 0 >Shredder (4) - Deep Sjeng(4) 1 - 0 >Herrmann (3) - List (3½) 0 - 1 >Ikarus (3½) - parSOS (3) 1 - 0 >AICE (3) - Pharaon (3) 0 - 1 >Nexus (2½) - Quark (3) ½ - ½ >XiniX (2½) - Ayito (1) 1 - 0 >Ant960 (2) - Homer (2) 1 - 0 >spielfrei (0) - Patzer (2) - - + > >regards Joachim I was thinking it was because of the odd openings had something to do with the small percent of draws. Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.