Author: Thom Perry
Date: 12:18:11 02/22/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 1999 at 14:37:19, blass uri wrote: > >On February 22, 1999 at 13:34:16, Thom Perry wrote: > >>No, I meant CM6K fake games. I'm still waiting with others to see whether the >>games from this "match" ever get posted. > >I understood that there is a problem with Hiarcs7's moves (cannot be reproduced) >The subject should be: Hiarcs7's weak moves against CM6K cannot be reproduced. > >You said nothing about CM6K's moves so CM6K is not the subject. > >Uri Hi Uri! I see a lot of your posts in this forum, and they are usually quite interesting. Wish I had time to do all of that chess analysis that frequently appears in your messages. Anyhow, with regard to the above, I don't think that it means anything. For example, suppose I play chess Program A againt Program B and want Program A to win. Periodically, during the game, I change the move that Program B selects and force it to make another but weaker move. I do this often enough until Program A wins. Well, if you played back the game under the original operating conditions, Program A would still continue to make the same moves, but Program B would want to play different moves; i.e., the moves that were originally selected but changed by me. Yesterday, someone requested that the games be posted with the Hiarcs evaluations. This would help to clear up any mysteries about these games with regard to what moves Hiarcs actually selected/played. But one day later, this request has not been granted and the evaluations have not yet been posted. You figure out what that means.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.