Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 08:20:28 08/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2005 at 11:05:38, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On August 15, 2005 at 10:43:34, Mathieu Pagé wrote: > >>>Do you plan to buy an old Sockel 754-Athlon? I would rather go for Sockel 939 >>>the are much cooler and consume very little power and hence very easy and good >>>to overclock. >>> >>>An AMD 64 3000+ is very cheap but most probably overclockable to 2.4 GHz. >>> >>>To answer your question, if your AMD Athlon 64 3400+ runs on 2.4 GHz (there are >>>different versions) you have most probably the chess performance of an Pentium 4 >>>3.8 GHz. >> >>I'm not a fan of overclocking. This mean I won't overclock it. >> >>This said is there an other reason to go with an socket 939 processor. I choosed >>this particular processor because I can have a good deal on it. >> >>Advices are welcome. >> >>Mathieu Pagé > >The socket 939 has more future perspective, means you could exchange the CPU if >you desire in the future more easily w/o changing the motherboard while socket >754 will be abandoned by AMD to my knowledge. >On the other hand, you can always buy a new motherboard in the future for 100 >bucks compatible to socket 939. Im not sure about the advantage of 939 right >now, except heat and energy consumption which favorites the newer 939 chips. You >normally get better deals for socket 754 systems because they are older. > >regards >Andy As Andy pointed out it is partly upgradability (there won't be new cores for the Sockel 754) but mainly less heat and less energy consumption (considerably). Of course an Athlon 64 3500+ (which is for chess speed comparable to your one) is a bit more expensive but I would choose the latter one. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.