Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:48:00 08/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2005 at 11:13:53, Matthew Hull wrote: >On August 15, 2005 at 11:09:18, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>here is what the log looks like right there... >> >> 17-> 2:37 2.93 36. Nge4+ Kf7 37. Reg1 g6 38. Ra1 Rc8 >> 39. b4 Rc6 40. Ra5 Bc7 41. Rxb5 Rxa6 >> 42. Rb7 Rd7 43. b5 Ra2 44. Rxa7 Rxa7 >> 45. Bxa7 (s=4) >> time=3:46 mat=2 n=3409233071 fh=94% nps=15.04M >> ext-> chk=178012213 cap=6954022 1rep=8620351 mate=436258 >> predicted=21 nodes=3409233071 evals=805830509 50move=4 >> endgame tablebase-> probes=0 hits=0 > > >I'm curious what the odds were that you could have gotten an 8-way dual core >machine. Perhaps for CCT8? > >Scary. If it won't scale to 8 processors, why would it scale to 16? :) Never know what I will show up at the next dance with, of course. This seems to have the AMD guys' interest and they are helpful beyond belief...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.