Author: Matthew Hull
Date: 14:39:42 08/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2005 at 17:37:59, George Speight wrote: >On August 15, 2005 at 17:33:55, Matthew Hull wrote: > >>On August 15, 2005 at 17:20:10, George Speight wrote: >> >>>The WCCC that is going on as we speak is strange to say the least. I wonder if >>>this is the official computer world championship they have each year. Fritz is >>>strangely absent, and im sure its not because of any fear one way or the other. >>>Maybe they didnt like the pairing system being used any more than u guys do. >>>Obviously Fritz knows in along match it cannot beat Shredder, but in short >>>tournaments like this the weaker programs have a better chance. I mean, who in >>>this tournament is going to have a chance if they had to play Shredder or Junior >>>a best of 24 match. But all this is neither here nor there- thing like this >>>could be argued until we are all 90 and senile. The strangest thing about this >>>tournament is there has been no mention whatsoever of it on the chessbase >>>website front page. I have looked every day-nothing. Last year it was the main >>>topic each and every day. This year, except for a few words i read about a month >>>ago, its like they are not even acknowledging that it is taking place. You would >>>think they would be giving day by day or round by round results. Nothing! It's >>>like they are not even interested. It makes me wonder if they are po'd because >>>the 2 freeware programs are in there, and what are they going to say if one of >>>them win against the supposed monster they charge $40 or $50 for. I have >>>nothing ag. chessbase- i own most of their commercial programs. But their >>>silence of this tournament is strange to say the least. Regards, George >> >> >>Chessbase was a sponsor last year and agreed to provide internet coverage. This >>year they are not a sponsor and their coverage is probably the same as it was in >>previous years where they were not involved. >> >>ICGA have provide the same coverage they always provide which is no coverage at >>all. They leave that to the discretion of the sponsors and/or locale. >> >>That's the basic ICGA "formula" for continuance and coverage of this event. >They dont have to provide coverage, but they could at least mention that it is >taking place and give a few results. Regards, George ICGA does't do that. I'm not sure what it is that they actually do, but that is definitely not one of them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.