Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:16:14 08/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 2005 at 16:14:37, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 16, 2005 at 16:05:39, Ingo Althofer wrote: > >>On August 16, 2005 at 15:57:30, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >>>1. Shredder 6 x 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 >>>2. Zappa 5 0 x 1 0 1 1 1 1 >>>3. Junior 4.5 0 0 x 1 1 1/2 1 1 >>>4. Fruit 4.5 1 1 0 x 1 1 0 1/2 >>>5. Crafty 2.5 0 0 0 0 x 1 1/2 1 >>>6. Diep 2.5 0 0 1/2 0 0 x 1 1 >>>7. Jonny 1.5 0 0 0 1 1/2 0 x 0 >>>8. Deep Sjeng 1.5 0 0 0 1/2 0 0 1 x >> >>Hello Gerd, >> >>thanks for the full information. >> >>Congratulations to Stefan for winning the Blitz title. >>Good luck for you for the remaining round of the WCCC! >> >>Ingo. > >congratulation for stefan and congratulation for fruit for scoring more than >Crafty and showing that number of processors is not the only important thing. > >It seems that fruit one processor is not weaker than Crafty 8 processors based >on the results. There are not enough games to form that determination. It may be true, of course. >I wonder if there were time losses because of bad operators. That is part of the fascination with blitz, I imagine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.