Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:33:29 08/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 2005 at 17:26:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 16, 2005 at 17:16:33, Paolo Casaschi wrote: > >>>I know that usually when program improve they improve in all time controls. >>>I do not know of evaluation changes or search changes that make programs weaker >>>at blitz but stronger at long time control. >>> >>>In thoery it can happen but I need to see a proof for it and I believe that >>>fabien mainly test in blitz time control(he can correct me if I am wrong) >>>because usually productive changes in blitz of adding knowledge to the >>>evaluation are also productive at long time control. >> >>Do you have any proof or evidence that there is some correlation between blitz >>strenght and slower speed strenght? >>If you dont, then we can only compare assumptions and I tend to agree with Bob >>Hyatt since the same non-correlation is evident with humans and because common >>sense... >> >>--Paolo > >Of course there is correlation. > >Look at every rating list at long time control and you can see Shredder,Fruit >Fritz,Junior,Hiarcs at the top of the list. > >Now look at rating list at blitz. >What do you see? > >Surprise for you >Again the same programs. > >You do not believe it? >Here are 2 rating lists one for blitz and another one for longer time control. > > >http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html >http://www.miko42.de/turniere/blitzturniere/blitzrangliste.html > > >Uri Did you even look at your data? The programs do _not_ finish in the same order.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.