Author: Robert Allgeuer
Date: 03:47:29 08/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 16, 2005 at 17:37:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 16, 2005 at 17:30:02, Paolo Casaschi wrote: > >>On August 16, 2005 at 17:26:28, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On August 16, 2005 at 17:16:33, Paolo Casaschi wrote: >>> ) > >There may be cases when A is 50 elo weaker at blitz and 50 elo better at long >time control but I doubt if you can find cases when A is 100 elo weaker at blitz >and 100 elo stronger at long time control. > Ktulu 7 is possibly the closest you can get to that, as far as I can see: it appears to be some >50 points weaker in Blitz than at long time controls. But it is still in the order of 50, not 100. Generally strengths in Blitz and at longer time controls correlate very well and differences are for almost all engines below 30 ELO points, as long as an increment in time control is used for Blitz (no 5 0 time controls). Robert >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.