Author: Thom Perry
Date: 04:09:11 02/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 1999 at 19:50:13, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On February 21, 1999 at 11:02:36, Richard Harrison wrote: > >>Hello to all, >> >>None of the games are faked...that is ridiculous since I have no bias or >>unstated interest in seeing either program win. I am and always have been a >>HIARCS fan and I am surprised as anyone with the score after six games of 5-1 in >>favor of CM6000. About duplicating the moves, H7 gets into major time crunches >>towards the end of its alloted time sometimes having only minutes to complete >>the last few moves. Plus with CM aggressive play, thinking on opponents time is >>not always beneficial to H7 because the program does not anticipate the line >>play. I also have the game scores from H7 which would dispell the notion that >>it is not H7 playing. >> >>Why would anyone 'fake' games and then post them? That is so silly, I reserve >>any comment on this subject. However based on the backlash towards CM6 over the >>past three months or so on this message board, the fact that someone brought >>this up does not surprise me. >> >>Rich > > >Rich just post the game score to shut these people up. We all know I like CM6K >and would just love to shut these people up once and for all, my games played >against Rebel 10 using the so called cooked opening books are the same, CM6K >thinks mainly on Rebel 10's thinking time, and in allot of cases has anywhere up >to 50 minutes more time on Rebel 10, this is not always the case but usually is. > >Keep up the good work, anything Good CM6K does I always like to hear. Looks like we are never going to see the games posted with the Hiarcs7 analyses, are we? Two days have gone by since the request, and the clock is still ticking...FAKE...fock...FAKE...fock...Fake...fock
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.