Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:54:30 08/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 17, 2005 at 16:10:20, Dimitris Poulos wrote: >On August 17, 2005 at 13:50:45, Roger Brown wrote: > >> >>>Hi Uri! >>> >>>Fruit 2.1 is around 2700 ELO. To make so strong engine stronger is not >>>easy for any man, Thomas, Fabien or you. >>>I am looking forward to your next Movei as I read somewere that you >>>are going to use some of the brilliant ideas in Fruit. >>> >>>Ómar. >> >> >> >>Hello Ómar, >> >>I am just curious - where are you getting your Fruit Elo numbers from? >> >>I should tell you that Uri is brilliant in his own right so if Movei improves it >>may have more to do with his efforts than his adoption of ideas in Fruit. > >I don't come to disagree but what will you say if we see an 100 elo jump from >most top programs? Business as usual? Chess Tiger 11.8 Pentium 90 MHz 2384 43 -43 261 50% 2385 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 2598 19 -19 1365 50% 2600 Chessmaster 5000 Pentium 90 MHz 2288 49 -45 240 67% 2163 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2476 61 -53 184 76% 2281 Chessmaster 8000 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2517 44 -45 251 45% 2549 Chessmaster 9000 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2715 36 -36 376 55% 2677 Fritz 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2234 40 -39 324 60% 2164 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2462 23 -22 1005 66% 2345 Gandalf 3.0 64MB P200 MMX 2367 41 -40 307 59% 2299 Gandalf 4.32f 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2532 28 -28 627 51% 2525 Gandalf 4.32h 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2524 34 -34 418 52% 2509 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2660 28 -28 604 52% 2649 Genius 5.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2331 18 -18 1558 47% 2350 Genius 6.5 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2475 29 -29 565 48% 2488 Hiarcs 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2335 18 -18 1437 51% 2331 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2462 21 -21 1112 55% 2423 Hiarcs 7.32 64MB P200 MMX 2472 21 -21 1134 52% 2459 Hiarcs 8.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2587 33 -34 440 42% 2647 Junior 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2290 22 -22 1035 42% 2344 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2539 21 -21 1088 50% 2537 Nimzo 3.5 Pentium 90 MHz 2296 22 -22 998 46% 2325 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2552 18 -19 1416 47% 2574 Rebel 7.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2302 26 -25 759 61% 2220 Rebel 8.0 51MB P200 MMX 2410 22 -22 1011 47% 2434 Rebel 9.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2338 23 -23 890 47% 2359 Rebel Century 3.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2518 30 -30 546 49% 2524 Shredder 1.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2284 59 -58 145 53% 2265 Shredder 2.0 58MB P200 MMX 2403 19 -19 1314 44% 2443 Shredder 3.0 64MB P200 MMX 2419 20 -20 1262 48% 2431 Shredder 4.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2569 23 -22 986 58% 2509 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2697 32 -32 473 53% 2679 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2804 22 -21 1133 69% 2663 Some of the increases are largely due to platform, but not all. Of course, it is harder to go from 2500 to 2600 than it is to go from 2400 to 2500. >>I agree with Uri that the genius is in writing Fruit in the first place. >>Tweaking and improving seems a lesser task to *me*. > >The same question as above. > >>Others may see it differently of course. >> >>:-) >> > >Of course. :-) > >Dimitris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.