Author: Andreas Guettinger
Date: 06:18:35 08/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2005 at 09:06:52, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On August 18, 2005 at 09:01:51, Majd Al-Ansari wrote: > >>I was watching the game on playchess and looks like Fruit won the game. Very >>impressive game considering Crafty was using 8 processors and Fruit only 1 >>processor. But I have to admit I think that Crafty was caught by poor book >>opening. Also I noticed that Fruit was playing a lot of Shredderesque moves. >>It was not choosing the moves that my Fruit was wanting to play but more of the >>moves Shredder like (eg. b4!). So the Fruit Mainz must be quite different >>indeed. > > >I have the same impression based on the few games by Fruit in Reykjavik: Fruit >has been changed a lot since version 2.1 and I expect it to be no.1 on single >processor lists. Me too I analysed with Fruit2.1 during some of the games, interestingly with the same hardware amd64 3400+ used at WCCC, but on Linux and with 512mb Hashtables (I don't know what HT size they use in WCCC). There are a some moves Fruit2.1 wouldn't have palyed on my system, but most of the time the evals didn't change much after a different move, so maybe the moves were evaluated pretty similar. regards Andy
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.