Author: Don Dailey
Date: 10:41:48 02/23/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 1999 at 02:09:35, Mark Young wrote: >Don, I find your defense of the moderator?s abusive actions puzzling; this is >totally inconsistent with how you moderated and Bruce and Amir. You took pride >in the fact of how few posts you had to delete. You were always respectful, even >when you did not like what the member saying. You were always professional in >your approach to the job of moderator, as was Bruce and Amir. And for this, you >earned most of the members? respect. > >Now you seem to have taken the new moderators under you wing, and like an over >protective mother you defend them as if they can do no wrong, and have done no >wrong. I think looking at your example at being moderator would better sever the >new moderators. > >Mark Young The new moderators are not "under my wing" and I believe they are doing a better job than I did. I was trying to take the opportunity to say some things I couldn't say when I was a moderator. Being a moderator is a repressive job, you are much more constrained about what you can say and you have to take criticism and abuse that would normally get any other member kicked out. I feel that their rights are abused and violated constantly by everyones knee jerk Pavlov dog reaction that if they say or do something, it must somehow be designed to oppress us. After all, they have a teeny tiny bit of power, they MUST be bad. So yes, I defend them because they are the oppressed minority, they are getting their rights abused every day and they are taking it with style and grace. And I am going to be outspoken about it, it's my right. And I'll be just as outspoken about the insensitivity of those who are abusing them in a most unfair way. - Don
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.