Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 00:50:13 08/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
>>Well if he was truly biased he would have given predictions that conspire to >>have Shredder end up equal first with 6.0 (not sure of the tiebreaks) :) >> >>As it is, it ends up with Fruit and Zappa on top. > >Well, in one game only nearly everything can happen, so I gave my best guesses >from a statistic points of view... > >Sandro I wasn't questioning all your predictions, only the ones involving you closest rival :) Actually if you look at my predictions you will see that we agree here and there. Your last point above i find very interesting, if you look at it from a statistical point of view, then i find it very hard to come up with any logic that supports Deep Sjeng beating Deep Junior (with deep sjeng having the black pieces even). From a statistical point of view this one should be a pretty clear 1-0 for Junior, well like you said much can happen and the games are pretty open so i wouldn't be terribly surprised if Zappa draws and Deep Sjeng wins, but i think the probability of Junior winning both games is higher. Mind you, Juniors loss to Crafty was it's first loss in 22 consecutive world championship games... Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.