Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:54:53 08/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2005 at 09:45:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On August 19, 2005 at 09:08:33, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 19, 2005 at 08:06:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On August 19, 2005 at 06:24:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>There were a total of 20 positions with colour reverse, each program was able to >>>play with white and then black side. I believe that this is the best way to have >>>a match of Chess960 since there is no openings and some positions favour white >>>more than black. >>> >>>PS: Shredder 9 UCI is a little bit stronger than Shredder Classic 1.3 >>>,therefore, I expect it to beat Spike by a margin of 55% to 45%. >>> >>>Jorge >> >>This was only match to test the learning abilities of shredder and spike in >>shuffle chess and has nothing to do with Chess960. >> >>No castling rights and the same position again and again. >> >>Uri > >So you are saying that all those games played by Shredder at the Chess960 World >Chess Championship were also Shuffle Chess? Since the FEN or X-FEN of Shredder >was the same as the one that I used for this match. No In the chess960 world championship players castled. Here there was no castling because the engine did not get castling rights. X-FEN of Shredder was not used in the games that you posted but normal fen without castling rights. I did not see notation like that is in shredder's fen for castling rights in the opening position. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.