Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 07:00:29 08/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2005 at 09:54:53, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 19, 2005 at 09:45:29, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On August 19, 2005 at 09:08:33, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 19, 2005 at 08:06:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On August 19, 2005 at 06:24:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>There were a total of 20 positions with colour reverse, each program was able to >>>>play with white and then black side. I believe that this is the best way to have >>>>a match of Chess960 since there is no openings and some positions favour white >>>>more than black. >>>> >>>>PS: Shredder 9 UCI is a little bit stronger than Shredder Classic 1.3 >>>>,therefore, I expect it to beat Spike by a margin of 55% to 45%. >>>> >>>>Jorge >>> >>>This was only match to test the learning abilities of shredder and spike in >>>shuffle chess and has nothing to do with Chess960. >>> >>>No castling rights and the same position again and again. >>> >>>Uri >> >>So you are saying that all those games played by Shredder at the Chess960 World >>Chess Championship were also Shuffle Chess? Since the FEN or X-FEN of Shredder >>was the same as the one that I used for this match. > >No In the chess960 world championship players castled. > >Here there was no castling because the engine did not get castling rights. > >X-FEN of Shredder was not used in the games that you posted but normal fen >without castling rights. > >I did not see notation like that is in shredder's fen for castling rights in the >opening position. > >Uri Thanks for clarifying it, does anybody knows how to correct this with the Shredder Classic 1.3 program from Stefan? Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.