Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 05:42:11 08/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2005 at 01:51:20, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >Our RK 2005 (90m+30s) was perhaps our last big tournament. >Due to lack of interest of the chess computer community I do >not think that we shall again have the spirit to ever start >such a long lasting tourney. I don't think there is a lack of interest at all. Seemingly there was, but actually i believe that many people followed the tournament without saying a word...... I always look at the results daily and the games regularly while i don't post too often my thoughts...... For me it is you and Leo(WBEC-Ridderkerk) after SSDF (and now GEGT and CSS lists has been added), that i look to understand what is the engine's strength. Just continue your GREAT efforts..........:-) > > Program Score % Av.Op. Elo + - > 1 Shredder 9 : 130.0/210 61.9 2489 2574 40 37 > 2 Junior 9 : 115.5/210 55.0 2496 2530 44 35 > 3 Chess Tiger 15.0 : 107.5/210 51.2 2499 2507 47 32 > 4 Fritz 8 : 106.5/210 50.7 2499 2504 48 30 > 5 Hiarcs 9 : 99.5/210 47.4 2502 2484 35 46 > 6 Gandalf 6.0 : 98.5/210 46.9 2503 2481 32 46 > 7 The King 3.33 : 97.5/210 46.4 2503 2478 32 46 > 8 Ruffian 2.1.0 : 85.0/210 40.5 2508 2441 38 41 >************************************************************************************ Hey! Shredder had many difficulties in this tournament.....:-) But really next time you should handicap Shredder with some way. Play without book would make other programs take their revenge for this humiliating defeat.....! Anyway i'm confused. At Leo's last premier The King 3.33 finished much better than Gandalf 6.0. Of course your tournament has 4 times more games but it's not yet clear who is better.......?!?!?!?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.