Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: RK 2005 (90m+30s) 840 games (Last tournament?)

Author: George Speight

Date: 18:45:11 08/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 20, 2005 at 04:09:57, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On August 20, 2005 at 03:43:51, Ómar Skúlason wrote:
>
>>Hi Kurt!
>>
>>I read everything you publish in this forum with interest even though
>>I have never commented on it.
>>I think the testing of yours is one of the most trusthworthy if not the most
>>trustworthy in the computer community.
>>If we talk about this test then I find it not very exciting. Everybody knows
>>that Shredder is the strongest of those participating but the order of those
>>from 2 to 5 is of more curiosity.
>>For me it is interesting to see that Chess Tiger is above Fritz and I
>>guess that it is Fritz Bilbao.
>>The Fruit test that you performed was very exciting and still is as
>>Fruit is now the *hottest* engine around.( or is it Zappa now?)
>>Short blitz tourneys don´t need to be "dumb" if you use reasonable
>>time setting, say time with increment; 4+2 or 5+5 or what ever with +.
>>
>>Best regards, Ómar.
>
>      Hi Omar
>      Nice to hear that you read everything I publish. As to Chess
>      Tiger I think it's still a very strong engine. In our tourney
>      we used Fritz 8.0.0.26 which seems somewhat weaker than Fritz 8
>      Bilbao. Fruit 2.1 test is still running (Nunn2 tests) and the
>      latest test will relate to Toga II 1.0 of which first results
>      will be published today. And finally: you are right that blitz
>      games should always run with time increment.
>      Best regards
>      Kurt
>Hi kurt  In case you are interested the programmer/s of both say that Bilbao is approximately 50 elo points stronger.   Regards, George



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.