Author: Fabien Letouzey
Date: 02:21:51 08/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2005 at 23:00:13, Uri Blass wrote: Hi Uri, >>Fruit2.1 does not like Nc3 by search. Interesting. >Let me guess that the evaluation was slightly different than public fruit and >the score for 9.Nc3 was 0.00 The only difference is a side-to-move bonus, proposed by Joachim Rang. >Let me guess that fruit could play 9.Nbd2 with different contempt score. >Am I correct? I will certainly have a look at all games after the tournament. >Note that it seems that this mistake did not change the place of fruit in the >tournament(second place). >Note also that if there are people who put their money on gambling that fruit >will not finish in the first 4 places based on your words before the tournament >then you need to apologize. Indeed, I am sure that many people are extremely mad at me for underestimating my own chances like this :) Thanks to those who did not believe me! Fabien.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.