Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:01:00 08/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 21, 2005 at 08:39:51, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>On August 21, 2005 at 07:23:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On August 21, 2005 at 06:53:15, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>
>> ... my hope is that Fruit will not support FRC
>> (Chess960). I prefer a proper running classical
>> chess engine not becoming faulty because of some
>> unnecessary FRC-code -:)
>> Kurt
>
>Your assumption is incorrect, Shredder did NOT lose due to having incorporated
>FRC-codes or FRC castling capability.
Who can be sure of that? To include unnecessary code in
a very complex chess program increases the possibility
that at some time strange things may happen. BTW, you
seem to have omitted my -:)
Kurt
Take a look a spike, and Glaurung, they
>both play great classical chess and Chess960. As a matter of fact, I believe
>that after Spike has FRC support, it is much stronger than any previous
>classical version, released before.
This has in my opinion nothing to do with the implementation
of FRC code. In future I would prefer to have the choice
between classical chess engine and FRC-engine.
Kurt
>
>Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.