Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 05:23:33 02/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 1999 at 05:50:33, Thom Perry wrote: >On February 23, 1999 at 18:58:22, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On February 23, 1999 at 13:44:44, Dan Kiski wrote: >> >>>On February 23, 1999 at 11:22:27, Thom Perry wrote: >>> >>>>On February 23, 1999 at 09:48:55, Dan Kiski wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 23, 1999 at 04:32:08, Tina Long wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 21, 1999 at 19:50:13, Micheal Cummings wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Rich just post the game score to shut these people up. We all know I like CM6K >>>>>>>and would just love to shut these people up once and for all, my games played >>>>>>>against Rebel 10 using the so called cooked opening books are the same, CM6K >>>>>>>thinks mainly on Rebel 10's thinking time, and in allot of cases has anywhere up >>>>>>>to 50 minutes more time on Rebel 10, this is not always the case but usually is. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Keep up the good work, anything Good CM6K does I always like to hear. >>>>>> >>>>>>Michael, >>>>>>Once you were caught you admitted that you were using books created by your >>>>>>"Friend". i.e. COOKED BOOKS for Rebel only, you didn't even reverse the >>>>>>openings to make it a little fair. So skip the "so called" part. >>>>>> >>>>>>1. g3 sheesh!! >>>>>> >>>>>>Tina Long, >>>>> >>>>>Michael clearly made no extravagent claims in that post and when asked openly >>>>>admitted using a non standard book. That is somewhat different from this case >>>>>where it seems that only results are claimed without even giving the game >>>>>scores. Your statements make it appear that Michael was trying to acheive >>>>>something with his post and I'm not even sure the "cooked books" statement is >>>>>fair since he was only experimenting. >>>>>Dan Kiski. >>>> >>>>I agree with Tina. As I recall, it wasn't until someone questioned the 1. g3 >>>>openings that the information about the "experimental" or "cooked" [or whatever >>>>you choose to call it] opening book came to light. Why not simply play the >>>>programs heads up without "experimenting" unless you wanted to make sure that >>>>CM6K would win? And if it were experimental, this should have been mentioned >>>>before the games were posted. >>> >>>But Michael only posted one game without happening to mention every single >>>detail, missing one, a slip on his part, which anyone checking the game as we >>>all do could easily see. And that don't make sure that the CM6K would win >>>because the book was experimental, it just means the book was experimental, not >>>"cooked". >>>Dan Kiski. >> >> >>Thom I explained all this and if you want to look at this in a negative way then >>I cannot help that, but let me explain it to you again. The game had just >>finished, I had 20 minutes till I had to go to work, so I copied the moves to a >>txt file, and then added what hardware I was using and hash tables. I got on the >>net and copied and pasted all of that to here. >> >>After that you will see I forgot to say what time control I was using so I >>posted again the time control, with 2 minutes till I had to catch the train I >>got off the net, I posted the games to see what reaction I would get to this >>type of game. I got back on a while later to see something about the g3 move, I >>explained this as an oversight and that I forgot to add this due to me being in >>a rush and corrected it. >> >>I still do not understand how you think I could be so dumb as to try a fool >>people on here who know more about computer chess than me as to play an opening >>move that one of the worlds best chess programs do not play. >> >>You are basically Tina and Thom calling me dishonest, I take offense to that, I >>explained how this happened you have given your opinion which is not true so >>just shut up about it, keep on saying this over and over again like Tina has >>been is just a plain personal attack. > >Sorry. I apparently missed some key messages back then as I had >remembered the event differently. Not a problem Thom, now I just wish my fellow Aussie Lady Tina would do the same. but being an Aussie like me, I do not think so :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.