Author: blass uri
Date: 06:05:12 02/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 23, 1999 at 11:55:42, blass uri wrote: > >On February 23, 1999 at 10:21:53, Dan Kiski wrote: > >>I read a number of posts on the subject of Rebel allegedly cooking some set >>tests a while back and wondered if Fritz had done something similar. >> >>When I play engine 5.15 v 5.32 tests using the Nunn openings I find 5.32 will >>win by Impressive margins 15 - 5, 15.5 - 4.5, 14.5 - 5.5. But when I play engine >>v engine normal matches they seem relatively even. > >It seems that they cooked Fritz5.32 to win the nunn test games. >This proves that the nunn test does not prove nothing about the strength of >chess engines because it is a known test. > >I suggest another test based on the positions after the 10 move of black in the >last category 18+ tournament. > >Uri There is a different explanation. Maybe Fritz5.32 is better at the opening stage of the game and it is the reason that Fritz5.32 is getting better results when both sides do not use the opening book in the nunn positions. If this is the case then I can understand the fact that Fritz5.32 is not better in practical games because usually both sides are out of book only near move 20 and Fritz5.32 is not better after move 20 I suggest to do a match of 40 games based on all the 20 positions after 1 ply: after 1.a3,1.a4,1.b3,1.b4,..... I am sure that Chessbase did not tune Fritz for this match so if Fritz5.32 wins convincingly then it will be a proof that Fritz5.32 is clearly better in the opening stage then Fritz5.16 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.