Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 02:48:26 08/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2005 at 02:55:07, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 21, 2005 at 21:06:58, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On August 21, 2005 at 19:56:20, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 21, 2005 at 19:48:42, Thomas Logan wrote: >>> >>>>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 40'/40+40'/40+40' 0 >>>> >>>> 123456 >>>>1 Shredder 9 110011 4.0/6 >>>>2 Toga II 1.0 001100 2.0/6 >>>> >>>>Its quite early but I do not think we have a Shredder destroyer here >>>>but testing will continue >>>> >>>>IMHO there is no evidence of Shredder being surplanted by a non commercial or a >>>>commercial for that matter >>>> >>>>Zappa if/when released should be an interresting test >>>> >>>>Tom >>> >>>I believe that the same as shredder against Fruit WCCC >>>It is clear that furit WCCC one processor destroyed Shredder 4 processors so >>>probably beating shredder with one processor is no problem for it. >>> >>Hi Uri >> >>It is hard to come to a conclusion based upon 1 game >> >>Factors inhibiting a conclusion >> >>Fruit wcc is not yet available for testing >> >>We do not know what version of Shredder was employed or its reliability >> >>The Fruit which is availble was not superior to Shredder in my testing >> >>So Until another Fruit is made available and proves itself superior I cannot say >>Shredder is surplanted >> >>Tom > > Hi Tom > Fruit 2.1 test (40'/40) can be seen at > http://www.utzingerk.com/fruit21_test.htm > also indicates that it is not stronger > than Shredder 9, see test 40'/40 at > http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm > Kurt Hi Kurt Yes I have seen this and other results as well and I agree Fruit 2.1 is not stronger than Shredder which until releases and victories by Wcc Fruit and/or Zappa remains the strongest available engine Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.