Author: blass uri
Date: 11:03:09 02/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 1999 at 11:46:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On February 23, 1999 at 16:17:09, blass uri wrote: > >>3r1b1k/pp6/2n2q1p/2Bp1B1Q/5P2/1P4p1/P7/4R1K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>This position is from a correspondence game >> >>White played 34.Re6(This is the best move and probably leads to a draw) >> >>This is a hard position for chess programs. >> >>Chessmaster6000 needed more than 20 minutes with ss=6 >>and almost 8 minutes with ss=10 on pentium200MMX >> >>other programs are even slower and cannot solve it in a reasonable time. > >We misunderstand here. You play correspondence chess here, but >want programs to find it within a few minutes, where you have 3 days >a move for? > >Diep needs 90 minutes to show the correct line, that is however >AFTER research, where most programs show just the fail high time. It is better than most of the programs The latest version of Junior5 needs almost 10 hours to fail high with Re6 on pentium200MMX Crafty16.4 as an engine for Fritz5 is better and found the right move after some hours(I do not know the exact time but I saw that Re6 was the 4th or 5th move(I am not sure) at depth 13, after an hour of analysis it considered Re6 as the 2nd move at depth 14 and after some hours I saw when I looked again at the screen that it suggested the right move after something close to 5 hours at depth 15(I do not know if it solved it at depth 14 or 15). Genius3 is working hard on this problem and it did not solve it after more than 21 hours on pentium100Mhz(it is considering the right move in the last hour at depth 13/25) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.