Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Zappa's dominating score...

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 13:20:32 08/22/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2005 at 15:51:22, Engin Üstün wrote:

>On August 22, 2005 at 15:31:29, Thomas Mayer wrote:
>
>>Hi Engin,
>>
>>On August 22, 2005 at 15:18:43, Engin Üstün wrote:
>>
>>>On August 22, 2005 at 11:57:33, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>>Is it the largest margin (by percentage of points) ever for a WCCC or WMCCC
>>>>event?
>>>
>>>zappa was played on 2 cpu dual core, Fruit play only on 1 cpu, clearly is Fruit
>>>the Campion for me.
>>>
>>>very interesting is a match on same hardware Zappa vs Fruit.
>>
>>so well, then I chose the machin Anthony did use... see ! Nothing is changed,
>>because Fruit so far just can use the single... so is Anthony to blaim because
>>he made his program MP ?
>>
>>Just a comparison for those which support the same hardware idea: now what to do
>>if one of those programs does not support opening book ? Must now everyone
>>disable opening books ? Or how about pondering, tablebases etc. ?
>>
>>Of course it will be interesting to see them fighting against each other with
>>single machines, but this was a world championship, everyone should bring the
>>best he can. The 2 x 2 *2.2 Ghz wouldn't have helped Fruit, in fact it would
>>have been even a bit slower on it, because each single processor has only 2.2
>>GHz.
>>
>>Anyway, Fruits performance was of course outstanding. Beaten several of those
>>hardware monsters and end up as clear 2nd. But don't lower the achievements of
>>Anthony, Zappa is without any doubt the deserved champ of that tournament.
>>
>>Greets, Thomas
>
>Hi Thomas,
>you are right but, i mean only who have the money for very fast mashines is
>clear better then other who can not spend so much for fast hardware?
>
>that is a question about a reach and poor programmers how engine is the best
>one.
>
>clearly is better a tournament with all engines can MP ond same MP 4 core
>mashines, with books, ponder and tablebases.
>or all engines playing on same 1 cpu hardware with book, ponder and tablebases.
>
>compare hydra 16 core mashine vs fruit 1 core mashine is not fairly.
>
>that is also near if one engine have 4 GB hashtables and the other one have only
>16 MB hash.

For WCCC, the intent is cleary the strongest chess system that can be built at
any cost (in the past, what was then supercomputers were entered).




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.