Author: Engin Üstün
Date: 13:57:00 08/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 22, 2005 at 16:20:32, Dann Corbit wrote: >On August 22, 2005 at 15:51:22, Engin Üstün wrote: > >>On August 22, 2005 at 15:31:29, Thomas Mayer wrote: >> >>>Hi Engin, >>> >>>On August 22, 2005 at 15:18:43, Engin Üstün wrote: >>> >>>>On August 22, 2005 at 11:57:33, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>Is it the largest margin (by percentage of points) ever for a WCCC or WMCCC >>>>>event? >>>> >>>>zappa was played on 2 cpu dual core, Fruit play only on 1 cpu, clearly is Fruit >>>>the Campion for me. >>>> >>>>very interesting is a match on same hardware Zappa vs Fruit. >>> >>>so well, then I chose the machin Anthony did use... see ! Nothing is changed, >>>because Fruit so far just can use the single... so is Anthony to blaim because >>>he made his program MP ? >>> >>>Just a comparison for those which support the same hardware idea: now what to do >>>if one of those programs does not support opening book ? Must now everyone >>>disable opening books ? Or how about pondering, tablebases etc. ? >>> >>>Of course it will be interesting to see them fighting against each other with >>>single machines, but this was a world championship, everyone should bring the >>>best he can. The 2 x 2 *2.2 Ghz wouldn't have helped Fruit, in fact it would >>>have been even a bit slower on it, because each single processor has only 2.2 >>>GHz. >>> >>>Anyway, Fruits performance was of course outstanding. Beaten several of those >>>hardware monsters and end up as clear 2nd. But don't lower the achievements of >>>Anthony, Zappa is without any doubt the deserved champ of that tournament. >>> >>>Greets, Thomas >> >>Hi Thomas, >>you are right but, i mean only who have the money for very fast mashines is >>clear better then other who can not spend so much for fast hardware? >> >>that is a question about a reach and poor programmers how engine is the best >>one. >> >>clearly is better a tournament with all engines can MP ond same MP 4 core >>mashines, with books, ponder and tablebases. >>or all engines playing on same 1 cpu hardware with book, ponder and tablebases. >> >>compare hydra 16 core mashine vs fruit 1 core mashine is not fairly. >> >>that is also near if one engine have 4 GB hashtables and the other one have only >>16 MB hash. > >For WCCC, the intent is cleary the strongest chess system that can be built at >any cost (in the past, what was then supercomputers were entered). hmmm... are you mean that on olympic games is doping allowed for high performance ?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.