Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:47:13 08/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2005 at 00:44:33, Cesar Contreras wrote: >"Clone" it's just a moral word. It seams to be intended to distinct "original" >from "not original" chess engines. Useless today in my opinion. Maybe a diferent >word can serve that good purpose for some more time. > >The fact it's that this diference don't exist anymore, most programs are pretty >unoriginal altought some have more original touches than others. > >So originality came in the form of some "touches of originality". > >I see some similarities with "moralily" or "good behavior": > >* Nobody really know what does "clone" means >* Every chess programmer is afraid being named a "cloner" >* If you defend a cloner be ready to be named a "cloner" >* If you discover a cloner, be ready to be named "X the just" >* Every programmer it's tempted to "clone" >* Everybody it's ready to punish the "clonner" >* Every new strong engine on town must "hide something" >* "Clone" meaned one thing 2 years ago, now means something diferent, it's like >a fashion thing. >* Things that some years ago meaned "to clone", now are bean threated with more >open mind. >* Everybody agree clonning it's bad (except some freaks out there). > > >My conclusion. > * Typical nonsense human behavior. > * Legality must be well defined, it's just wrong to punish someone for >something that undefinied. > >PD. I hope this is not copyrigthed. Note that the same problem is not only with chess programs but also with book. It is undefined when a book is not original. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.