Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:19:59 08/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2005 at 09:04:00, Cesar Contreras wrote: >>Your implication, that nobody knows what a clone really means, is just wrong. I >>state that Bob knows exactly what it means but that doesn't mean that he can >>prove a clone a clone in minutes. You are confusing this practical difficulty >>with the knowledge of the specific factors for clone states. > >I would like to see a clone definition from Bob. In fact a would like to see a >definition agreement, to put some order on this topic. You see, this is exactly the main point of the debate. The ICGA oficials are almost all (except Levy) are academics like Bob. So, for Bob it's kind of strange how premature they behave. In such a case it's NOT usual that you come from the outside and help out. No, you better let them dig their holes so deeply that they are in real difficulties. Difficulties they are responsible for. You know what I mean? They are so arrogant that they would NOW never admit that they made mistakes. So let them continue. At this moment Bob alone can't change them to the better. IMO the whole problem will be solved through the new mode of internet tournaments that are way better for computerchess. Nowadays it's a real anachronism to spend a whole week with operating veritable chess pieces while everybody is playing on the chess servers including the computers. I mean also computerchess lovers have only one life to live!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.