Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: question about definition of clones

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 17:33:53 08/23/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 22, 2005 at 11:05:18, rasjid chan wrote:

>Uri,
>
>You could be in some trouble... because of open source.
>
>Say you examined how Fruit does king safety and you find that the method is one
>of the best. You cannot yet find a better way to do it, ie. any other way to do
>king
>safety is worst and you cannot emulate his method (without proper authorization)
>and you are stuck. Fruit now has an indirect copyright over a method by
>publishing
>his code.

He has copyright but not patent.  You can use his method but not his code.
That is something I am very sure of.  But morally it might make some people
angry.  And ethically (and possibly legally -- I am not sure) you would need to
give credit to the original work.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.