Author: Marc Lacrosse
Date: 22:42:59 08/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2005 at 22:00:47, A. Cozzie wrote: >>zappa (1.0) was a big disappointment for all (and was in not a single test able >to enter the top ten). > >I would tend to disagree here. For example, Zappa 1.0 running in 32 bit mode >(60% slower than the real version) and with a total shit random book already got >7th place in WBEC. So I think that Zappa 1.0 when run on a 64-bit computer is >already about the same strength as Gandalf 6 at 40/40 on good hardware. > >anthony Maybe, maybe not : http://www.husvankempen.de/nunn/rangliste.html (40+40) 33 Zappa 2571 09 Gandalf 2660 03 Fruit21 2713 http://www.computerschach.de/index.php?option=com_wrapper&wrap=erangliste&Itemid=152 : (10 min + 10 sec) 24 Zappa 1.0 2557 11 Gandalf 6.0 2650 02 Fruit 2.1 2755 http://www.sedatchess.cjb.net/ (15 min +5) 22 Zappa 2596 10 Gandalf 6.01 2660 02 Fruit 2.1 2783 Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.