Author: Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
Date: 16:14:56 02/24/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 24, 1999 at 16:58:15, Don Beal wrote: >On February 24, 1999 at 12:44:41, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>My program runs at a 4 processor Xeon from Bob, but it is running >>at a PC-system, and it also available at 1 processor. >> >>Does that count too? > >You have to choose whether to enter the 4-processor version, or the >1-processor version. If you enter the 4-processor version it won't >be eligible for the current microcomputer title. > >This raises an interesting question, though. Would the participants >welcome another title category for multi-processors of the Xeon type? >They look like becoming widespread machines. The disadvantage of >too many titles is that it creates confusion and might be thought to >devalue the existing title. I'd be interested to hear the opinions >of the participants. > >Don Beal. For what it's worth, I don't think the time for "commercially available multiprocessor system" title is here, yet. How many multiprocessor entries do you have so far? How many entries could go either way? Crafty and Diep, it seems ... Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.