Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 01:01:43 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 03:26:35, Vikrant Malvankar wrote:
>On August 24, 2005 at 03:02:38, Kolss wrote:
>
>>On August 24, 2005 at 01:44:39, Vikrant Malvankar wrote:
>>
>>>Shredder vs Zappa which i found on www.shredderchess.com
>>>
>>>
>>>[Event "WCCC"]
>>>[Site "Reykjavik"]
>>>[Date "2005.08.20"]
>>>[Round "9"]
>>>[White "Shredder"]
>>>[Black "Zappa"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 {Buch 0s} c5 {10s} 2. Nf3 {Buch 0s} d6 {9s} 3. d4
>>>{Buch 0s} cxd4 {9s} 4. Nxd4 {Buch 0s} Nf6 {11s} 5. Nc3
>>>{Buch 0s} g6 {8s (a6)} 6. Be3 {Buch 0s} Bg7 {8s} 7. f3
>>>{Buch 0s} O-O {9s} 8. Qd2 {Buch 0s} Nc6 {7s} 9. O-O-O {Buch
>>>0s} d5 {19s} 10. exd5 {Buch 0s} Nxd5 {11s} 11. Nxc6 {Buch
>>>0s} bxc6 {11s} 12. Nxd5 {Buch 0s} cxd5 {15s} 13. Bh6 {Buch
>>>0s} Qc7 {11s (Lxh6)} 14. Bxg7 {+0.87/20 6:31m} Kxg7
>>>{11:10m} 15. h4 {+0.66/21 0s} h5 {9:54m} 16. Re1 {+0.64/20
>>>0s} Rb8 {6:08m (e5)} 17. g4 {+0.70/18 3:43m} hxg4 {8:34m
>>>(Th8)} 18. h5 {+0.55/19 7:46m} Qb6 {8s (Th8)} 19. c3
>>>{+0.55/17 2:57m} Rh8 {2:23m}
>>>
>>>Curiously the next 3 moves r played in 3 to 4 and max. 59 sec. time at
>>>relatively low depths of 17 and 18 while in all the other games depth of
>>>Shredder wasatleasst 21 to 22 in middlegame.
>>>
>>>20. fxg4 {+0.41/17 51s} Bxg4
>>>{4:14m} 21. h6+ {+0.18/18 4s} Kf8 {2:50m} 22. b3 {+0.14/18
>>>59s} Rc8 {5:17m (Dc5)}
>>>
>>>23. Kb2 {+0.26/18 6:07m} d4 {3:35m}
>>>
>>>6 minutes thinking time bt still depth 18 on this move?
>>>
>>>24. c4 {-0.08/19 1:15m} Bf5 {1:24m}
>>>
>>>whereas 1 min. thinking time for depth 19 after only 1 move?
>>>
>>>25. Bd3 {-0.06/18
>>>4:39m} Bxd3 {7s} 26. Qxd3 {-0.09/19 2:26m} Qd6 {16s}
>>>27. Qd2 {-0.18/18 3:27m} Rh7 {2:56m (f5)} 28. Qg5 {-0.14/17
>>>3:00m} f5 {3:03m (Tc5)} 29. Ref1 {-0.13/18 5:44m} Rc5
>>>{3:03m (De6)} 30. Qg2 {-0.88/18 5:48m} Kf7 {1:53m} 31. Rf2
>>>{-1.19/17 2:49m} Qf6 {1:54m (e5)} 32. Rff1 {-1.20/18 7:02m}
>>>a5 {12s} 33. Qa8 {-1.04/18 1:30m} g5 {2:49m} 34. Kc2
>>>{-1.70/18 4:36m} Re5 {6s (f4)} 35. Kc1 {-1.80/17 2:47m} g4
>>>{1:57m (f4)} 36. Kd1 {-2.38/17 4:21m} Rh8 {11s (d3)}
>>>37. Qg2 {-3.22/18 3:47m} d3 {12s} 38. Qf2 {-3.22/17 3:46m}
>>>a4 {6s} 39. Qh4 {-4.43/15 8:08m} Re2 {2:11m} 40. Qxf6+
>>>{-11.89/17 7:15m} exf6 {8s} 41. b4 {-9.30/21 2:56m} Rxa2
>>>{2:11m} 0-1
>>>
>>>Ofcourse i may be wrong bt. what i think is all the depths are relatively low
>>>when compared to other games.
>>>Ofcourse Zappa played very well to take over in this game. :)
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>Vikrant Malvankar
>>
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Search depth in a real game highly depends on whether the last move of the
>>opponent was expected or not, i.e. pondering plays a cricital role. If the
>>previous move was expected ("correct" pondering), you reach much higher depths
>>than if the previous move was unexpected ("incorrect" pondering), as in the
>>latter case, you have to start searching from the start again.
>>
>>E.g., in move 23 Shredder had pondered on the wrong move, had to restart again,
>>and thus "only" reached 18 ply. In move 24, Shredder had already pondered on the
>>correct move for 3:35 minutes, so the time it used was actually the 1:15m plus
>>3:35 = 4:50. On top of that, you always have fluctuations; e.g., pondering on a
>>trivial move or just having very few options oneself increases search depth.
>>
>>Hope this helps...
>>
>>Best regards - Munjong.
>
>Thanks
>bt in other games i saw avg. depths of 21 to 23 , so was Zappa playing
>unexpected moves?
I suppose because in this game, the position is sery open (QRR can move on many
square in some moves), so, the pruning factor is lower and branching factor is
higher.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.